Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2006
Publication Source
Psychological Science
Volume Number
17
Issue Number
1
First Page
38
Last Page
45
Publisher
SAGE
ISSN
0956-7976
Abstract
Two studies examined misperceptions of disagreement in partisan social conflicts, namely, in the debates over abortion (Study 1) and politics (Study 2). We observed that partisans tend to exaggerate differences of opinion with their adversaries. Further, we found that perceptions of disagreement were more pronounced for values that were central to the perceiver's own ideology than for values that were central to the ideology of the perceiver's adversaries. To the extent that partisans assumed disagreement concerning personally important values, they were also inaccurate in perceiving their adversaries' actual opinions. Discussion focuses on the cognitive mechanisms underlying misperceptions of disagreement and strategies for reducing inter- group conflict.
Recommended Citation
Repository citation: Chambers, John R.; Baron, Robert S.; and Inman, Mary L., "Misperceptions in Intergroup Conflict: Disagreeing About What We Disagree About" (2006). Faculty Publications. Paper 1520.
https://digitalcommons.hope.edu/faculty_publications/1520
Published in: Psychological Science, Volume 17, Issue 1, January 1, 2006, pages 38-45. Copyright © 2006 SAGE.
Comments
Chambers, J. R., Baron, R. S., & Inman, M. L. (2006). Misperceptions in Intergroup Conflict: Disagreeing About What We Disagree About. Psychological Science, 17(1), 38–45. Copyright © 2006 (Association for Psychological Science). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01662.x