Responding to Our Own Transgressions: An Experimental Writing Study of Repentance, Offense Rumination, Self-justification, and Distraction
Journal of Psychology and Christianity
Christian Association for Psychological Studies
This between-subjects experiment focused on offender responses to their past interpersonal transgressions in self-identified Christian undergraduates (55 M, 85 F). Participants completed pre-post measures for one of four randomly assigned 20-minute writing conditions: repentance (i.e., writing about constructive sorrow, apology, restitution, behavior change), offense rumination (i.e., negative wallowing), self-justification (i.e., externalizing blame, minimizing costs), or distraction (i.e., daily details). Offense rumination and repentance writing included the most cost-oriented language; rumination had the most negative emotion language. Mixed within (pre vs. post) X between group ANOVA interactions yielded theoretically meaningful results. Repentance reduced self-condemnation and regret while increasing conciliatory motivations toward the victim (to apologize, make restitution, and seek forgiveness). Offense rumination was associated with remorse and self-condemning isolation from the victim and God. Self-justification reduced remorse and self-condemnation, and exaggerated perceptions of divine forgiveness. Implications for the interrelated literatures on interpersonal offenses, confession, apology, restitution, repentance, forgivenessseeking, and self-forgiveness are addressed. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
Self-identified Christians, Repentance, Offense Rumination, Self-justification
Witvliet, C.V.O., Hinman, N.G., Exline, J.J., & Brandt, T. (2011). Responding to our own transgressions: An experimental writing study of repentance, offense rumination, selfjustification, and distraction. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 30, 223-238.
Visit the Journal of Psychology and Christianity at http://caps.net/membership/publications/jpc